Investigation users was 237 people and you will 248 girls (N = 485) have been worry about-announced heterosexual

Investigation users was 237 people and you will 248 girls (N = 485) have been worry about-announced heterosexual

Investigation users was 237 people and you will 248 girls (N = 485) have been worry about-announced heterosexual

Even though there is consistent and you may convergent medical literature towards accessory principle therefore the positive and negative reactions that safer and vulnerable looks, correspondingly, lead to inside wedded life, no degree had been discovered that on top of that checked-out this new parameters said for the this study, demonstrating those that dichotomously discriminate the newest connection layout as well as the fresh magnitude off discrimination. Differentiating the team from activities one to characterizes each one of the connection appearance and you may demonstrating and this situations feel the ideal power away from discrimination might possibly be another impact that can indicate research and you may input agendas for partners psychotherapy.

Within experience, the goal of this study was to evaluate whether or not the correspondence, marital improvement, quality, regularity and intensity of issues parameters carry out discriminate people with safer and you will insecure accessory into the heterosexual dating. Ergo, the hypothesis checked are that negative telecommunications, methods off attack and prevention, regularity and you will intensity of disputes details would characterize visitors because the those with vulnerable attachment, additionally the discover telecommunications, consensus, satisfaction, cohesion and you can relationship improvement, plus the arrangement parameters perform characterize him or her as those with safer accessory looks.

Participants

This really is a decimal, cross-sectional study that utilizes a detailed and you may explanatory construction. Minimal chronilogical age of men people try 20 while the limitation was 79 (Yards = ; SD = ). Minimal period of females participants is 18 and also the restriction was 76 (Meters = ; SD = ) ( Dining table step one).

Tools

1) Sociodemographic questionnaire: The new survey of the sociodemographic features of your members was sent out using a survey having fourteen concerns one examined: ages, intimate positioning, place of quarters, relationship condition, period of newest relationships, life out of a past dating, duration of previous relationship, knowledge, doing work outside the family, workload, individual earnings, amount of college students and you can faith.

2) Experience in Close Relationship – Reduced (ECR-R-Brazil) ( Natividade Shiramizu, 2015 Natividade, J. C., Shiramizu, V. K. M. (2015). Uma medida de apego: versao brasileira da Experiences in Close Relationship Scale-Reduzida (ECR-R-Brasil). Psicologia USP, 26(3), 484-494. ): The scale assesses the anxiety and avoidance of attachment factors in the marital relationship. The ECR-R-Brazil has affirmative phrases that respondents must categorize on a seven-point Likert scale that ranges from “strongly agree” to seven “strongly disagree”. The scale has ten items, five on the anxiety factor and five on the avoidance factor. In the analysis of the main components of the items of the ECR-R-Brazil carried out in the study by Natividade and Shiramizu (2015) Natividade, J. C., Shiramizu, V. K. M. (2015). Uma medida de apego: versao brasileira da Experiences in Close Relationship Scale-Reduzida (ECR-R-Brasil). Psicologia USP, 26(3), 484-494. , with good data adequacy, Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin (KMO) = 0.80; Bartlett’s sphericity test, ? 2 (66, N = 4.879) = ; p < 0.001. The final model from the confirmatory factor analysis showed an optimal fit, as pointed out in the study: ? 2 = 101.8; Degrees of freedom (df) = 25; p = < 0.001; ? 2 /df = 4.07; Goodness-of-Fit Index (GFI) = 0990; Adjusted Goodness-of-Fit Index (AGFI) = 0.990; Normed Fit Index (NFI) = 0.990; Tucker–Lewis Index (TLI) = 0.990; Comparative Fit Index (CFI) = 0.990; Root Mean Square Error of Approximation (RMSEA) = 0.025; Confidence Interval (CI) = 90%. In this study, the ECR-R-Brazil had a Cronbach's Alpha of 0.64 for men and 0.57 for women.

3) Mosmann, C., Wagner, Good., Sarriera, J. (2008). An effective qualidade conjugal como preditora dos estilos educativos parentais. Revista Psicologia Lisboa, 22(2), 161-182. Recuperado de ): The new conflict measure is actually put into one or two subscales: in the first, called “conflict-disagreement”, 9 products are exhibited and may getting assessed to the a six-part Likert size regarding the regularity with which the causes for conflict expressed occurred in the very last season, ranging from “rarely” in order to half dozen “pretty much every go out”. On the second subscale, entitled “conflict-aggression”, around three items are presented talking about the new concentration of issues, this https://datingranking.net/nl/tinychat-overzicht/ type of should be assessed on the a great Likert measure of five activities between “never” to help you four “always”. From the research so you’re able to adjust the size regarding English so you’re able to Portuguese, good Cronbach’s Leader away from 0.71 try found. Within this studies, Cronbach’s beliefs was indeed 0.80 for men and 0.77 for ladies.

Share this post

Deja una respuesta

Tu dirección de correo electrónico no será publicada.